The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Cactus Communications. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. ISSN 1097-6256 (print). A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? response letterresubmit, 3. //-->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Joseph Bullano And Leslie Sansone, Michael Jackson Album Sales 2021, Articles E